1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 2009.05.28 19:36, Alec Warner wrote: |
5 |
[snip] |
6 |
> |
7 |
> The community could of course just deny the features that require |
8 |
> glep55 (no bash4, no global scope changes, etc..) I guess the |
9 |
> community is doing that by default anyway by repeated discussing this |
10 |
> glep and not implementing anything. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> |
13 |
> |
14 |
[snip] |
15 |
|
16 |
GLEP55 is not in a fit state to be approved. Its a technical paper |
17 |
submitted to this list for peer review. As many have pointed out, as a |
18 |
technical paper. it lacks quantified, objective discussion of the |
19 |
problem and the various solutions it touches on. |
20 |
|
21 |
- -- |
22 |
Regards, |
23 |
|
24 |
Roy Bamford |
25 |
(NeddySeagoon) a member of |
26 |
gentoo-ops |
27 |
forum-mods |
28 |
treecleaners |
29 |
trustees |
30 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
31 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) |
32 |
|
33 |
iEYEARECAAYFAkoe3vkACgkQTE4/y7nJvatqXQCfR70cUj06JN4bOFuccihREE6x |
34 |
J18Ani/YQ5jSLql6X3uff27FHfkrZFgp |
35 |
=J2CX |
36 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |