1 |
Rémi Cardona wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Le 18/08/2009 03:30, Steven J Long a écrit : |
4 |
> [snip] |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Steven, |
7 |
> |
8 |
> This thread was dead for more than 4 days. Yet you pick it up and you |
9 |
> try to pick a fight with Ciaran. |
10 |
> |
11 |
No I was answering the points he made, specifically he gave the fact that |
12 |
something's not used in the tree as a reason not to put it in PMS. The |
13 |
prior mail about an alternative perspective on the process was about his |
14 |
continual digs at portage and its developers. You're right that much of it |
15 |
was more relevant to -project, but when I post there it gets ignored: |
16 |
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/msg_6c82019575749b628de20de060149782.xml |
17 |
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/msg_28e2659029951f7edeab10b01cd21d53.xml |
18 |
|
19 |
> I for one am tired of your behavior on this list |
20 |
Fair enough. I'm tired of ciaran's, and I'm bemused that you didn't take the |
21 |
opportunity to contact me off-list to discuss this. I'm on IRC most of the |
22 |
time, as any of several Gentoo developers could have told you. |
23 |
|
24 |
> and I will not hesitate |
25 |
> to contact UserRel to get you out of this list if you don't settle down |
26 |
> and start acting like an adult. |
27 |
> |
28 |
If you wish to raise a bug go ahead. As for being adult-like, you don't seem |
29 |
to have behaved so yourself, afaIc. No, some of us don't respond the very |
30 |
next minute, nor do we consider 4 days a long time. Perhaps for a student |
31 |
with far too much time on his hands, it might be. |
32 |
|
33 |
The main point I was talking about was the subversion of the GLEP process by |
34 |
the EAPI one. You might have missed it; next time try reading the whole |
35 |
mail. |
36 |
|
37 |
> Now step away from this thread. |
38 |
> |
39 |
Done. |
40 |
-- |
41 |
#friendly-coders -- We're friendly but we're not /that/ friendly ;-) |