| 1 |
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 16:27:01 +0200 |
| 2 |
Tomáš Chvátal <scarabeus@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Well the patches code is in base eclass. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Then you should first consider moving epatch to PMS. I'd honestly |
| 7 |
prefer going the other way. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> For Recommended it works like this: |
| 10 |
> blabla.spec |
| 11 |
> Recommended: xf86-video-ati |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> zypper in blabla |
| 14 |
> ... |
| 15 |
> You might consider installing these additional packages: |
| 16 |
> xf86-video-ati |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> It for sure needs more thinking as this is just basic idea. It might |
| 20 |
> even take into account that if you install the recommended patckage |
| 21 |
> with oneshot it should not be depcleaned unless all recommending |
| 22 |
> packages are gone too, and so on. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
It had some thinking, and ended up in no agreement. There's really no |
| 25 |
reason to hack up the spec to replace one hack with another. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Best regards, |
| 29 |
Michał Górny |
Archives