1 |
On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 20:38:18 -0600 |
2 |
Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Some packages, like dbus[1], have testing features that, while useful |
5 |
> for developers and arch-testers, aren't something that should be |
6 |
> foisted on users. Dbus' case is extreme, as it builds-in functions |
7 |
> that are useful for unit testing, but result in an insecure and |
8 |
> unstable package |
9 |
|
10 |
You could build it twice in the same ebuild... Of course, you still |
11 |
wouldn't be testing the same thing as you're installing, but then again |
12 |
upstream releases it that way. |
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
Regards, |
16 |
jer |