| 1 |
Yeah, to me, having those in the emulation category just |
| 2 |
doesn't...."fit" there, but, that's just me. Maybe we could take xen, |
| 3 |
vmware, qemu, and related packages out of app-emulation, and make a new |
| 4 |
category, app-virtualization. That would seem to fit a bit better then |
| 5 |
emulation. |
| 6 |
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 12:11 +0100, Chris Bainbridge wrote: |
| 7 |
> On 03/07/06, Benedikt Böhm <hollow@g.o> wrote: |
| 8 |
> > On Monday 03 July 2006 21:56, Nick Devito wrote: |
| 9 |
> > > Okay, in that case, extend the vserver herd to include a larger range of |
| 10 |
> > > virtualization stuff, including Xen, Bochs, and so on. It just seems |
| 11 |
> > > more fitting to group those packages together. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > not really, bochs, qemu and vmware is emulation, merely used in virtualization |
| 14 |
> > environments |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Qemu (with the kqemu module) and vmware both directly execute the |
| 17 |
> native bytecode. Bochs is the only real emulator. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives