Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
On 08/25/2010 08:29 PM, Duncan wrote:
> But that was pretty much decided some time ago, based on my following of
> the relevant discussions here and elsewhere, so why are you arguing a
> point that's not being argued any more? I believe that's what Mike's
> WTFing about. It's not that you're wrong, you're not, it's that you're
> debating a question that's no longer being asked.
>
See:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/67098
and
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/67098
The post I replied to cited upstream issues as a reason not to adopt
OpenRC. My point is that upstream issues are not a distinguishing
factor between OpenRC and baselayout-1.
It isn't like I'm re-opening a thread from months ago. I'm replying
directly to a point others have raised.
If there is no debate about whether OpenRC should be adopting it, then
why is it even being discussed in this way? Let's just do it...
Rich
|
|
