* Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> schrieb:

> My suggestion, as I said to fosdem, is to freeze, or take a
> snapshot if you like, of the current tree, stabilize what you
> need to stabilize, test the whole tree ( at least compile wise )
> for a couple of weeks and then replace the existing stable tree. 

hmm, would it make sense to add a new masking for the testing
tree, so users could decide which stability grade vs they wish ?
or perhaps use overlays for that ?

For example, I'd like to have the critical packages (everything
that's needed to bootup and do basic remote maintenance) from
the new frozen-stable tree, but other things should stay as
they are.


cu
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/

 phone:  +49 36207 519931  email: weigelt@...
 mobile: +49 151 27565287  icq:   210169427         skype: nekrad666
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme
----------------------------------------------------------------------