1 |
On 22 June 2010 16:54, Peter Hjalmarsson <xake@×××××××××.net> wrote: |
2 |
> tis 2010-06-22 klockan 15:17 +0530 skrev Arun Raghavan: |
3 |
>> On 21 June 2010 21:23, Arun Raghavan <ford_prefect@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
>> [...] |
5 |
>> > I'm still trying to think of a good name. I understand the concerns |
6 |
>> > about "introspection" being too generic and non GNOME-y, but "gir" is |
7 |
>> > likely to cause confusion. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> "gir" is not good because it gives near-zero information. |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> I can still not think of short enough USE flag. I propose we stick to |
12 |
>> "introspection". There isn't anything on the horizon that might |
13 |
>> overlap with this flag, and I don't see why we should drop using a |
14 |
>> simpler flag for the *possibility* that it might overlap with |
15 |
>> something else in the future. We can deal with this if it happens. |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>> Cheers, |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Why not just gintrospection? |
20 |
|
21 |
I still think "introspection" is easier to grok. It's unlikely that |
22 |
it's going to be used in a completely different sense by other |
23 |
packages in the future, so let's stick with "introspection" please. |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Arun Raghavan |
27 |
http://arunraghavan.net/ |
28 |
(Ford_Prefect | Gentoo) & (arunsr | GNOME) |