-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2009.02.24 21:23, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:17:57 +0000
> Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o> wrote:
> > > PN and PV are metadata, same as EAPI.
> >
> > So we made a mistake with PN and PV and may compound it with EAPI.
> > How long before we *must* have other pieces of information in the 
> > filename?
> 
> Uh, never.
> 
> > When will the filename get so long as to become unwhieldy ?
> 
> Uh, never.
> 
[snip]

> Except that once we have EAPI in the file extension, we can change
> anything we want in arbitrary ways without having to worry about
> backwards compatibility, so we won't need silly hacks.
> 
> -- 
> Ciaran McCreesh
> 
Ciaran,

Your response amounts to empty assertions.  Never is a long time.
It reminds me of a similar assertion that "640kB [of RAM] will be 
enough for anyone".

- -- 
Regards,

Roy Bamford
(NeddySeagoon) a member of
gentoo-ops
forum-mods
treecleaners
trustees
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkmkcKkACgkQTE4/y7nJvaujMwCdES699P2BXc6VBRKfG4S9As4o
CakAnAp8tsStf1NfKp1AEsGAQC8yxuoE
=zCeb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----