Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
Subject: Re: SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 12:15:08 -0400
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 13:51, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:23, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 6:16 PM, justin wrote:
>>>> Another question, do we have a rule, how the metadata.xml has to be
>>>> indented? Tabs or n spaces?
>>>
>>> There's no rule, but we should follow the same rule as ebuilds —
>>> indentation should be with a tab that's displayed as 4 spaces in
>>> editors (no expansion of tabs to spaces).
>>
>> meh ... let devs do whatever they want
>
> Didn't I just say there's no rule?

and if you keep reading, you'll see that you also said "devs should XXX"
-mike


Replies:
Re: SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml
-- Nirbheek Chauhan
References:
SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml
-- justin
Re: SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml
-- Nirbheek Chauhan
Re: SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml
-- Mike Frysinger
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml
Next by thread:
Re: SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml
Previous by date:
Re: SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml
Next by date:
Re: a virtual advantage ?


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.