Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: "Aaron W. Swenson" <titanofold@g.o>
Subject: Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 12:58:01 -0400
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 05/30/2012 12:53 PM, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> On Wed, 30 May 2012, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:16 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o>
>> wrote:
>>> Yeah... this is why I was asking about access to infra to test
>>> the conversion; so far, I haven't had any replies, though.
>> 
>> A mock conversion would probably help with creating 
>> procedures/docs/etc as well.  It is nice to say that we're "just
>> going to use git" but I think everybody has a slightly different
>> picture of how that is going to work.
> 
> I recommend having a smallish set of willing alpha/beta testers
> for this. This usually helps with some of the near-edge cases.
> You'll still find a thousand other bugs once things go live for 
> everybody. Still, it turns a million into a thousand. It also gives
> you slightly more realistic load test. .... Regards, Tobias
> 

As one that's relatively new to Git, I'm a perfect candidate for
testing. If we go this way, I volunteer.

- - Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iF4EAREIAAYFAk/GUZkACgkQVxOqA9G7/aDxogEAjEsS6k0M9TejvCAoYISvuk1u
odo5ecLsyshwvwRlk3sA+wUeVAfGrafgH1gKpSrEedk1OT5x7HfsMquK0owq0/Np
=mzDU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Replies:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Justin
References:
Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Michael Weber
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Alexey Shvetsov
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Rich Freeman
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Duncan
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Dirkjan Ochtman
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Rich Freeman
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Tobias Klausmann
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Next by thread:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Previous by date:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Next by date:
Should packages auto-eselect alternative implementation on removal?


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.