1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 06/24/2012 12:11 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: |
5 |
> Just to remember everyone what gnome team actually tried to |
6 |
> achieve to reduce any pain from users or devs alike with gnome3 |
7 |
> work: * have libs slotted when possible (to the extent of manpower |
8 |
> available), so gtk USE flag means gtk, whatever slot is needed by |
9 |
> the package using it, * have applications use one toolkit or the |
10 |
> other according to maturity of the interface and will of the |
11 |
> maintainer. This avoids useless back/forward porting work when |
12 |
> upstream actually doesn't care about one of the toolkits in |
13 |
> question |
14 |
|
15 |
I agree and this is exactly what my tracker is about, to track porting |
16 |
issues or even misuse of gtk{,2,3} useflags. You confuse me. |
17 |
|
18 |
My tracker has shown that not all ebuilds follow that policy or even |
19 |
can't because of migration issues or cause they are special in another |
20 |
way. |
21 |
|
22 |
If you think I missed something in my explanation there, add a comment. |
23 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
24 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
25 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ |
26 |
|
27 |
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJP5uzxAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzzO8H/1+Zs4BiZWIPwsLmCTfHWdH8 |
28 |
kGBylD/TKhJqOU9BimIzlqqKVa0Ikw/hak2vWSdsor/P5dJ/oAQqvUK+S9HWsEaI |
29 |
fCxzoZQZ/ghbYE4a3Ob8V0KWc0602OYO0WKZ9DAHqb47377VYO/CIQ2tsBG9oKM5 |
30 |
gah5fBZnf9mbMGRKREkPLwMG5L6Nl9j34JNO+BB5xBAWhLnNp3JmWfKLMzILWaKf |
31 |
R14uHG78ETDVp3uvQdgbMYzEzRE+a8iaH0lF9ekJwJ5qcGGWhP4mafDHTO4PGPjM |
32 |
OC9Hqt9eMqQFLdjaAxguH9HDyWEhoEg90RQfSK+FsOj2HOMX5s/XevXrdrNF2Uk= |
33 |
=hxx4 |
34 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |