| 1 |
On 10/13/2011 03:10 AM, Matt Turner wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 10/13/2011 02:27 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> Mike Frysinger schrieb: |
| 5 |
>>>>> The removed qutecom ebuild was not broken at any time. |
| 6 |
>>>> |
| 7 |
>>>> by splitting my reply, you changed the meaning. having qutecom in the tree |
| 8 |
>>>> with a depend on versions that i'm now removing breaks the depgraph. |
| 9 |
>>> |
| 10 |
>>> The depgraph is broken after the old versions are removed, not before. |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> I'm not sure if you should have gentoo-x86 access anymore... This is scary. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Come on. That's ridiculous, and nothing but trolling. Don't do that. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Like in the pngcrush thread, miscommunications all around. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Matt |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
(see my reply to Mike. I admit that came out way too blunt. sorry |
| 22 |
Chi-Thanh, Matt.) |
Archives