Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
| Navigation: |
|
Lists:
gentoo-dev:
< Prev
By Thread
Next >
< Prev
By Date
Next >
|
| Headers: |
|
To:
|
gentoo-dev@g.o
|
|
From:
|
Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o>
|
|
Subject:
|
Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-video/ffmpeg: ffmpeg-0.10.2.ebuild ChangeLog
|
|
Date:
|
Mon, 19 Mar 2012 15:05:46 -0300
|
|
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 07:46:40 +0200
Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote:
> On 03/19/2012 07:39 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 13:54:03 +0000 (UTC)
> > "Alexis Ballier (aballier)"<aballier@g.o> wrote:
> >
> >> aballier 12/03/18 13:54:03
> >>
> >> Modified: ChangeLog
> >> Added: ffmpeg-0.10.2.ebuild
> >> Log:
> >> version bump
> >>
> >> (Portage version: 2.2.0_alpha91/cvs/Linux x86_64)
> >
> >
> >> FFTOOLS="aviocat cws2fws ffeval graph2dot ismindex pktdumper
> >> qt-faststart trasher"
> >>
> >> for i in ${FFTOOLS}; do
> >> IUSE="${IUSE} +$i"
> >> done
> >
> >
> > Is it really useful to have such fine-grained control over these?
> > ffmpeg already has a ton of USE flags. Would you consider just
> > putting these under "tools" or something?
>
> I'd prefer to drop all USE flags which don't have external deps and
> just always install them
>
> (We actually discussed this with beandog on #gentoo-media month ago
> or something, and he suggested same)
>
imho it doesnt hurt anyone to have fine-grained control
what could be discussed is to put these into a use expand variable, to
better distinguish between important useflags and less important ones
is that what you mean by 'putting these under "tools" or something?' ?
|
|
