| 1 |
Yeah, that was definately a misunderstanding of something bonzaikitten said. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Mea culpa. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Andrew |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Brian Harring wrote: |
| 8 |
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 02:08:01AM -0400, Andrew D Kirch wrote: |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
>> Ciaran, |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> I've talked with the pkgcore people and they don't use the EAPI's (or |
| 13 |
>> PMS) in the first place. |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> No clue who you talked to, but they weren't speaking for pkgcore- I |
| 17 |
> speak for pkgcore pretty much solely. Pkgcore utilizes EAPIs- hell I |
| 18 |
> added the original support to portage. Not sure what info you got |
| 19 |
> fed, but it was a bit off. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
>> I think that ending this discussion here and moving it over to a forum |
| 23 |
>> more appropriate to package manager development would reduce the |
| 24 |
>> temperature around your proposals and get them implemented (as Zac seems |
| 25 |
>> willing to do so). |
| 26 |
>> |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> I don't particularly care one way or another (subscribed to both |
| 29 |
> MLs), just mostly correcting one large misstatement... |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> ~harring |
| 32 |
> |
Archives