1 |
Dne neděle 08 Listopad 2009 17:57:10 Jeroen Roovers napsal(a): |
2 |
> On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 18:24:10 +0100 |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Tomáš Chvátal <scarabeus@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
> > * Masking beta... |
6 |
> > This masks are good if the software release is KNOWN to break |
7 |
> > previous behaviour or degrade user experience. Otherwise the software |
8 |
> > should not be masked (its TESTING for purpose, not stable). |
9 |
> > Also the maintainer should watch if the testing branch is still |
10 |
> > relevant (why on earth we have masked 4.0.3_p20070403 version of |
11 |
> > screen when newer 4.3 is stable ;]) and remove the branch+mask when |
12 |
> > needed. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> I agree with your criticism (i.e. that the mask should not be there, |
15 |
> especially not for "testing" as what the mask does is *prevent* testing |
16 |
> instead of enabling it), but must note that your version sorting |
17 |
> algorithm appears to be flawed: pkg-vX_pY (for patch level) is always |
18 |
> greater than pkg-vX. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Regards, |
22 |
> jer |
23 |
> |
24 |
I agree that _p is newer than that. |
25 |
But if we look on tag of screen-4.0.3 or its release: |
26 |
screen-4.0.2.tar.gz 27-Jan-2004 05:46 821K |
27 |
screen-4.0.2.tar.gz.sig 27-Jan-2004 05:47 65 |
28 |
screen-4.0.3.tar.gz 07-Aug-2008 06:30 821K |
29 |
screen-4.0.3.tar.gz.sig 07-Aug-2008 06:30 65 |
30 |
You see the pattern? It is 1 year newer than it. |
31 |
|
32 |
Tomas |