List Archive: gentoo-dev
On 23:15 Sun 29 Jun , Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 29-06-2008 07:29:57 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Saturday 28 June 2008, Petteri Räty wrote:
> > > Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis kirjoitti:
> > > > I would like to suggest that default LDFLAGS in Gentoo contain the
> > > > following flags: "-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common".
> > > >
> > > > -O1 enables some basic optimizations.
> > >
> > > At least adding -O1 should not be problematic. I think vapier was
> > > already suggesting this quite a while ago.
> >
> > imo -Wl,-O1 should go into base
>
> I prefer not. Please only on profiles that use GNU binutils as linker.
That's the rule, not the exception, so I think that profiles with
non-gnu linkers should revert it.
Thanks,
Donnie
--
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
|
| Replies: |
Re: Suggested default LDFLAGS+="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common"
-- Fabian Groffen
|
| References: |
Suggested default LDFLAGS+="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common"
-- Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
|
Re: Suggested default LDFLAGS+="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common"
-- Petteri Räty
|
Re: Suggested default LDFLAGS+="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common"
-- Mike Frysinger
|
Re: Suggested default LDFLAGS+="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common"
-- Fabian Groffen
|
| Navigation: |
|
Lists:
gentoo-dev:
< Prev
By Thread
Next >
< Prev
By Date
Next >
|
| Previous by thread: |
| Re: Suggested default LDFLAGS+="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common" |
| Next by thread: |
| Re: Suggested default LDFLAGS+="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common" |
| Previous by date: |
| Re: Re: When the version scheme changes |
| Next by date: |
| Re: Re: Re: Multislot dependencies |
|