1 |
On 27 February 2010 21:48, Mark Loeser <halcy0n@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o> said: |
3 |
>> The last few times I've dropped into bugday, its been very quiet, which |
4 |
>> suggests its in need of some tlc but maybe its just my timezone. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Its been pretty much dead. We need more developer involvement so users |
7 |
> can actually talk to them and help resolve issues. If we can't get |
8 |
> enough developers to participate then we should just stop trying to do |
9 |
> it instead of putting on such a poor showing. |
10 |
|
11 |
I would like to be involved but not in the current disorganized form. Our |
12 |
#gentoo-bugs channel topic still refers to the thoroughly outdated |
13 |
bugsday.g.o page, and I can't edit either of them. |
14 |
|
15 |
We need an easier interface to mark bugs to be tackled on bugday, |
16 |
and I like Sebastian's proposal for that. The idea for the bugsday.g.o |
17 |
page is good, but it needs to be brought up-to-date and accessible |
18 |
to all devs. Low barriers to participation and all that. And even devs |
19 |
who cannot take part on the day itself could participate by requesting |
20 |
certain bugs or issues to be tackled. |
21 |
|
22 |
Also, participating devs should get permission to commit easy fixes |
23 |
for packages they don't maintain (the other thread about commit |
24 |
policies is relevant here). Obviously issues that are more involved |
25 |
need to be passed on to the proper maintainers. |
26 |
|
27 |
I think if we can get a few devs and possibly some users together |
28 |
to organize this in a better way, this could be useful. But if things |
29 |
are to stay the way they are, then we better stop pretending. |
30 |
|
31 |
Cheers, |
32 |
-- |
33 |
Ben de Groot |
34 |
Gentoo Linux developer (qt, media, lxde, desktop-misc) |
35 |
______________________________________________________ |