Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC:sys-apps/portage @overlay atoms postfix support
Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 17:56:15
Message-Id: 4A198A54.8030502@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC:sys-apps/portage @overlay atoms postfix support by Nirbheek Chauhan
1 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
2 > On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
3 > <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote:
4 >> On Sun, 24 May 2009 22:50:45 +0530
5 >> Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o> wrote:
6 >>> Won't this just lead to dependency hell? With horrible dependencies
7 >>> between different overlays?
8 >> It's primarily a user feature. It's not a good way of solving most
9 >> inter-repository dependency issues.
10 >
11 > If that's the case (usage being command-line use), then I'm all for
12 > it. But not in *DEPEND.
13 >
14 I'm also very much for it, especially for use in /etc/portage, to be
15 able to mask/unmask a version from a specific overlay.
16
17 --
18 Ben de Groot
19 Gentoo Linux developer (qt, media, lxde, desktop-misc)
20 Gentoo Linux Release Engineering PR liaison
21 ______________________________________________________