| 1 |
James Cloos schrieb: |
| 2 |
>>>>>> "TS" == Thomas Sachau <tommy@g.o> writes: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> TS> I just tried libgit2 (dev-libs/libgit2-0.16.0) and it installs just fine |
| 5 |
> TS> for me, so i cannot reproduce this (base version for my portage is |
| 6 |
> TS> 2.2_alpha87), what are your versions of portage and libgit2? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> As I implied by saying master, -9999. libgit2 is also 0.16.0. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I tried updating portage just before posting, the log says that was from |
| 11 |
> 9997bb9c81e07 to 4a85888920244. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> My last successful install of libgit2 was 0.15.0 back in October, so the |
| 14 |
> change which made portage start failing ebuilds which try to dodoc dirs |
| 15 |
> was done sometime in the last four months. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> TS> P.S.: No need to cc me, i am subscribed to this list. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> I'm used to lkml-style etiquette; include everyone who has posted in the |
| 20 |
> CC. It tends to be the norm on technical lists, and is what gnus does |
| 21 |
> by default if I reply to the copy sent directly. I (now) see that this |
| 22 |
> lists munges reply-to, so this reply honours that.... |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> -JimC |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Not much i can help with, since i cannot reproduce this myself. |
| 27 |
Maybe you ask portage maintainers on irc in #gentoo-portage or on the |
| 28 |
related mailing list about this. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Thomas Sachau |
| 33 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
Archives