Gentoo Archives: gentoo-devhelp

From: James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com>
To: gentoo-devhelp@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-devhelp] dodoc vs directories
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 06:58:21
Message-Id: m339a6821d.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-devhelp] dodoc vs directories by Thomas Sachau
>>>>> "TS" == Thomas Sachau <tommy@g.o> writes:
TS> I just tried libgit2 (dev-libs/libgit2-0.16.0) and it installs just fine TS> for me, so i cannot reproduce this (base version for my portage is TS> 2.2_alpha87), what are your versions of portage and libgit2? As I implied by saying master, -9999. libgit2 is also 0.16.0. I tried updating portage just before posting, the log says that was from 9997bb9c81e07 to 4a85888920244. My last successful install of libgit2 was 0.15.0 back in October, so the change which made portage start failing ebuilds which try to dodoc dirs was done sometime in the last four months. TS> P.S.: No need to cc me, i am subscribed to this list. I'm used to lkml-style etiquette; include everyone who has posted in the CC. It tends to be the norm on technical lists, and is what gnus does by default if I reply to the copy sent directly. I (now) see that this lists munges reply-to, so this reply honours that.... -JimC -- James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com> OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-devhelp] dodoc vs directories Thomas Sachau <tommy@g.o>