Gentoo Archives: gentoo-devhelp

From: "de Almeida
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>, gentoo-devhelp@l.g.o
Subject: RE: [gentoo-devhelp] gdbm ebuild with 64bit off_t
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:43:30
Message-Id: D2D7D9FE2492524A925313E2D82E1B5307857779@ORNLEXCHANGE.ornl.gov
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-devhelp] gdbm ebuild with 64bit off_t by Mike Frysinger
1 > -----Original Message-----
2 > From: Mike Frysinger [mailto:vapier@g.o]
3 > Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2008 5:17 AM
4 >
5 > > >
6 > > > ok ... but does that solve your problem ?
7 > >
8 > > Yes, this does solve gdbm's problem. I tried the newly emerged gdbm
9 and
10 > > was able to create large data bases beyond the ~2GB file size limit.
11 I
12 > > generated 3.1GB databases and twice as large.
13 > >
14 > > Will the ebuild change be a part of future ebuild versions?
15
16 Will I have to modify the gdbm ebuild in the future as I update my
17 gentoo systems? Or will the ebuild be modified in future versions?
18
19 Thanks,
20
21 --
22 Valmor
23
24 > >
25 > > I have exchanged e-mails with the gdbm maintainer and he said
26 databases
27 > > written with 32bit off_t will not be read/modified by gdbm when
28 compiled
29 > > with 64bit off_t.
30 >
31 > that's because you're only changing how gdbm interfaces with the C
32 > library.
33 > you arent changing the gdbm API/ABI.
34 > -mike
35 --
36 gentoo-devhelp@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-devhelp] gdbm ebuild with 64bit off_t Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>