Gentoo Archives: gentoo-devrel

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-devrel@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-devrel] devrel meeting etc
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 17:08:08
Message-Id: 200509071308.45318.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-devrel] devrel meeting etc by Jon Portnoy
On Wednesday 07 September 2005 12:35 pm, Jon Portnoy wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 05:34:32PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Sep 2005 12:27:32 -0400 Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o> wrote: > > | The point is that separate groups are a pointless complication that > > | won't help anything. That does not affect documenting things in the > > | least. > > > > No no. Separate groups reduces the likelihood that a few biased devrel > > members will be able to set themselves up as the judge, jury and > > executioner. > > How does separate groups address that? They're both drawn from devrel > members aren't they? Didn't you know we're actually one single-minded > conspiracy-driven hive mentality?
did you not read his response or did you just go 'ciaran replied, it must be garbage' ? he said: larger sep groups *reduces* the likelihood that a few biased members can control the flow of the whole process -mike -- gentoo-devrel@g.o mailing list