1 |
Erm, the commitee would consist of those devrel people who origionally |
2 |
volonteered to be part of the judge/investigation parts. |
3 |
|
4 |
I'm not sure where you got the "any dev" idea. |
5 |
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Elfyn McBratney wrote: |
6 |
|
7 |
> Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 16:25:21 +0000 |
8 |
> From: Elfyn McBratney <beu@g.o> |
9 |
> Reply-To: gentoo-devrel@l.g.o |
10 |
> To: gentoo-devrel@l.g.o |
11 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-devrel] devrel meeting etc |
12 |
> |
13 |
> On Tuesday 06 Sep 2005 17:02, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
14 |
>> On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 11:19:48 -0500 (CDT) Deedra Waters |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> <dmwaters@g.o> wrote: |
17 |
>> | Basically, for the most part, the transparency of how complaints are |
18 |
>> | handled stays the same. The only thing i really want to change, is |
19 |
>> | that i think that a commitee of say 3 to 5 people handles a complaint |
20 |
>> | from beginning to end. Basically, i think that this is much simpler, |
21 |
>> | and the devrel members i've mentioned it to seem to like this idea. |
22 |
>> | The big thing for most people is that what ever happens, the |
23 |
>> | transparency needs to stay, and i completely agree there. |
24 |
>> |
25 |
>> Mmmm, judge, jury and executioner. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Eh ? I really don't see your point here. From past meetings I've attended, |
28 |
> this 'committee' will be made up of not just devrel members, but other |
29 |
> run-of-the-mill developers, too. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> So. Care to justify your statement ? |
32 |
> |
33 |
> Elfyn |
34 |
> |
35 |
> |
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
Deedra Waters - Gentoo developer relations, accessibility and infrastructure - |
39 |
dmwaters@g.o |
40 |
Gentoo linux: http://www.gentoo.org |
41 |
|
42 |
-- |
43 |
gentoo-devrel@g.o mailing list |