| 1 |
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 11:21:33AM -0500, Paul Varner wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 08:52 -0500, Deedra Waters wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I said from the beginning that I had not written up a proposal for it. |
| 4 |
> > Why? Because i wanted some form of discussion first so that i could get |
| 5 |
> > a feel for people's concerns and thoughts on it besides those who i've |
| 6 |
> > already talked to. Proposals are great and all, but it helps when you |
| 7 |
> > actually see what people expect first... |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Since we are talking about a displinary process, my expectation is to |
| 10 |
> see a documented, open process that is as fair and balanced as we as an |
| 11 |
> organization can be. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I expect that the facts will be documented. I expect that the persons |
| 14 |
> making the decision will be as impartial as fully possible. I expect |
| 15 |
> that any decisons that contain adverse consequences to be well thought |
| 16 |
> out and documented. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Nobody said anything about openness or documenting things or anything, |
| 20 |
that really has nothing to do with having separate groups at all. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
The point is that separate groups are a pointless complication that |
| 23 |
won't help anything. That does not affect documenting things in the |
| 24 |
least. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Jon Portnoy |
| 28 |
avenj/irc.freenode.net |
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-devrel@g.o mailing list |
Archives