| 1 |
On Tuesday 06 September 2005 12:19 pm, Deedra Waters wrote: |
| 2 |
> A lot of people have told me after the fact that having seperate |
| 3 |
> judicial and investigative branches make things too complicated and the |
| 4 |
> end result is too much red tape. Some disagree and think that things |
| 5 |
> won't/aren't too complicated. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
well, this sounds like moving back to the 'way it was' right ? we've seen |
| 8 |
that way doesnt work quite so well, while the new way hasnt really been |
| 9 |
tested |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> Basically, for the most part, the transparency of how complaints are |
| 12 |
> handled stays the same. The only thing i really want to change, is that |
| 13 |
> i think that a commitee of say 3 to 5 people handles a complaint from |
| 14 |
> beginning to end. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
so you're talking about merely reducing numbers here rather than changing |
| 17 |
anything else about how the complaint process is handledright ? all other |
| 18 |
aspects of the process in terms of what needs to be done (investigate, |
| 19 |
communication, council balance check, etc...) are unchanged ? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
i'm not saying i agree with the idea, i just want to be sure of the exact |
| 22 |
details of the proposal |
| 23 |
-mike |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-devrel@g.o mailing list |
Archives