Gentoo Archives: gentoo-devrel

From: Ferris McCormick <fmccor@g.o>
To: gentoo-devrel@l.g.o
Cc: Michael Tindal <urilith@g.o>, gentoo-core@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-devrel] Re: [gentoo-core] Devrel Proposal
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 13:40:42
Message-Id: Pine.LNX.4.63.0506121329340.25895@terciopelo.krait.us
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 I sent this to gentoo-core yesterday, but gentoo-core seems to be missing
5 in action. I am not sure who, if anyone, received it. gentoo-devrel is
6 the intended audience, anyway.
7
8 If you are seeing your second or third copy of this message, I apologise,
9 but I can't tell what mail sent to @genroo.org addresses yesterday made
10 it, which are still queued, and which are lost.
11 ===============================================
12
13 I have now read http://dev.gentoo.org/~urilith/devrel-proposal.txt
14 and still like it a lot. At this point, I'd like to suggest a few textual
15 changes which have no effect on the proposal besides wording changes:
16
17 1. As I mentioned previously, I think the procedure we are discussing
18 is better described as a hearing rather than a trial (but the verb
19 'tried' is fine with me).
20 2. In the spirit of point 1, I'd change 'Defendant' to 'Respondent'
21 since the developer involved is responding to a complaint more
22 than defending an action. (And, it's a "kinder, gentler" word.)
23 3. For uniformity, I'd try to keep the final policy in present tense
24 imperative (rather than subjunctive, unless subjunctive is
25 intended for expressing a preference rather than a requirement).
26 4. The last word of the proposal is actually spelled 'moot'.
27
28 Sorry to seem excessively pedantic (well, picky), but if people agree with
29 me on any of these, we are talking editing changes which have no
30 substantive effect (oe at least, I don't intend any), and are more easily
31 done now than later.
32
33 I'm picking at this because I like it. If I didn't like it, I wouldn't
34 care how it read.
35
36 Regards,
37 Ferris
38
39 - --
40 Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o>
41 Developer, Gentoo Linux (sparc)
42 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
43 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
44
45 iD8DBQFCrDtnQa6M3+I///cRAqz0AKCv7MNPux03xAMKPwqeJzMzLP4gGgCeJCMK
46 fl89bTqfb1IBFRiz3VO0HQI=
47 =34J0
48 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
49 --
50 gentoo-devrel@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-devrel] Re: [gentoo-core] Devrel Proposal Michael Tindal <urilith@g.o>