Gentoo Archives: gentoo-devrel

From: Ferris McCormick <fmccor@g.o>
To: gentoo-devrel@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-devrel] devrel meeting etc
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 15:52:34
Message-Id: 1126194751.17628.10.camel@polylepis.inforead.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-devrel] devrel meeting etc by Elfyn McBratney
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 16:25 +0000, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 Sep 2005 17:02, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 11:19:48 -0500 (CDT) Deedra Waters > > > > <dmwaters@g.o> wrote: > > | Basically, for the most part, the transparency of how complaints are > > | handled stays the same. The only thing i really want to change, is > > | that i think that a commitee of say 3 to 5 people handles a complaint > > | from beginning to end. Basically, i think that this is much simpler, > > | and the devrel members i've mentioned it to seem to like this idea. > > | The big thing for most people is that what ever happens, the > > | transparency needs to stay, and i completely agree there. > > > > Mmmm, judge, jury and executioner. > > Eh ? I really don't see your point here. From past meetings I've attended, > this 'committee' will be made up of not just devrel members, but other > run-of-the-mill developers, too. >
As written currently, it's "Developer Relations members." Or I missing your point? Regards, Ferris -- Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o> Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Devrel)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature