| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Thomas Cort wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Thu, 18 May 2006 14:41:03 -0500 |
| 6 |
> Mike Doty <kingtaco@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
>> The flamewars on public communication channels is out of hand. it's |
| 8 |
>> having an negative effect in many parts of gentoo, even those that are |
| 9 |
>> not directly affected by the said war. This is something that urgently |
| 10 |
>> needs to be addressed. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I agree. Your suggestion is great! |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
>> Sometimes people need a bigger kick in the ass though, which is where a |
| 15 |
>> short term ban helps. When I say a short term ban, I mean 30-90 |
| 16 |
>> minutes. it allows everyone to cool off without them using bad judgment |
| 17 |
>> and popping back in. I do similar enforcement in #-amd64 and it works |
| 18 |
>> very well. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> A short term ban is a good idea, it lets people know they did something wrong without interrupting their development work. May I suggest that it only be a ban on sending mail to the list, not recieving it. It would be a pain for someone who was banned to have to search through the archives to find all of the messages within a specific time window. |
| 21 |
interesting thought, I'll poke people about this. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
- -- |
| 25 |
======================================================= |
| 26 |
Mike Doty kingtaco@g.o |
| 27 |
Gentoo/AMD64 Strategic Lead PGP Key: 0xA797C7A7 |
| 28 |
Gentoo Developer Relations |
| 29 |
===GPG Fingerprint=== |
| 30 |
0094 7F06 913E 78D6 F1BB 06BA D0AD D125 A797 C7A7 |
| 31 |
======================================================= |
| 32 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 33 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
iD8DBQFEbNYa0K3RJaeXx6cRAt2hAJ9AZCCqMxM3yns51iBkW7bUKtc4zwCdH4F/ |
| 36 |
zpLnZRfmk6u2MfwMWB1ftrc= |
| 37 |
=0XEg |
| 38 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
gentoo-devrel@g.o mailing list |
Archives