Gentoo Archives: gentoo-devrel

From: Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o>
To: gentoo-devrel@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-devrel] devrel meeting etc
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 23:54:13
Message-Id: 20050906235401.GA27731@cerberus.oppresses.us
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-devrel] devrel meeting etc by Paul Varner
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 12:58:50PM -0500, Paul Varner wrote:
> > My gut reaction to reading this proposal was no! While I can see a need > for reducing the number of people involved with a complaint, I firmly > feel that in order to ensure fairness in the complaint process that > there needs to be checks and balances in place. The recent changes to > split the investigative from the judical side of developer relations and > make everything transparent as possible does much to accomplish this. >
No, mostly it does a lot to accomplish castrating devrel and making it ineffective. We have a working council now, that means if somebody feels devrel is acting unfairly or not being open enough there's a body to appeal to. -- Jon Portnoy avenj/irc.freenode.net -- gentoo-devrel@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-devrel] devrel meeting etc Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o>