| 1 |
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 12:58:50PM -0500, Paul Varner wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> My gut reaction to reading this proposal was no! While I can see a need |
| 4 |
> for reducing the number of people involved with a complaint, I firmly |
| 5 |
> feel that in order to ensure fairness in the complaint process that |
| 6 |
> there needs to be checks and balances in place. The recent changes to |
| 7 |
> split the investigative from the judical side of developer relations and |
| 8 |
> make everything transparent as possible does much to accomplish this. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
No, mostly it does a lot to accomplish castrating devrel and making it |
| 12 |
ineffective. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
We have a working council now, that means if somebody feels devrel is |
| 15 |
acting unfairly or not being open enough there's a body to appeal to. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Jon Portnoy |
| 19 |
avenj/irc.freenode.net |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-devrel@g.o mailing list |
Archives