More like making it a bit easier for devrel to get things done. Trigger
happy? Not hardly, and if we ever did become that way, then even i would
think something is wrong there.

If the council did overrule devrel, i would hope that they at least
provided an explanation so that we understool the reasons why, and could
make things better, and improve.
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:

> Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 01:35:15 +0100
> From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o>
> Reply-To: gentoo-devrel@g.o
> To: gentoo-devrel@g.o
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-devrel] devrel meeting etc
> 
> On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 19:54:01 -0400 Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o> wrote:
> | No, mostly it does a lot to accomplish castrating devrel and making
> | it ineffective.
> |
> | We have a working council now, that means if somebody feels devrel
> | is acting unfairly or not being open enough there's a body to appeal
> | to.
>
> So you are aiming for a trigger-happy devrel that tries its hardest to
> kick off anyone it feels like, whilst relying upon the council to keep
> it honest?
>
> If it ever gets to the stage of the council overruling devrel, I'd hope
> that the council would also impose sanctions against devrel to
> discourage them from abusing their power again. If the council does
> ever have to overrule devrel, it suggests that something is seriously
> wrong with devrel's procedures...
>
>

-- 
Deedra Waters - Gentoo developer relations, accessibility and infrastructure -
dmwaters@g.o
Gentoo linux: http://www.gentoo.org

-- 
gentoo-devrel@g.o mailing list