On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 09:51:12PM -0500, Paul Varner wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 16:41 -0500, Deedra Waters wrote:
> > The devrel members who first approached me on this think that this is
> > too much red tape for something that 1, is literally probably going to
> > almost never be used 2, it's going to take too long to do anything with,
> > and take too long to get results that are going to make people happy,
> > and 3 most of them agreed to this policy because at the time it looked
> > like the best option. In looking  back at it, it's not the best option,
> > so they want something less complicated.
> > 
> 
> 1. If it is almost never used, where is the extra red-tape?

The point is not taking forever and a day to respond when things do 
happen.

> 2. Why is it going to take too long to get results?

Because there will be endless meetings and discussions.

> 3. What has changed to make it not look like the best option?
> 

People took a step back from trying to just do whatever it takes to 
please the handful of "devrel == stalin" folks

-- 
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net
-- 
gentoo-devrel@g.o mailing list