Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-devrel
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-devrel: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-devrel@g.o, gentoo-core@g.o
From: Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o>
Subject: Suspended devs and -core
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 15:27:28 -0500
My understanding is that a dev who is suspended loses all access to
-core.  Is that right?  Assuming so, it occurs to me that if we expect
the dev to come back (and I assume we do, or the dev would be expelled 
instead of suspended), then perhaps it would make more sense to only remove
write access to -core, while leaving read access?  An alternative would
be if we archived -core, and the newly reinstated dev could then read
the archives, but read-only access seems simpler.  The rationale is that
in those rare cases where suspended devs return, it benefits Gentoo if
the suspended dev is able to stay up to date.

Thougnts or comments?

Thanks,
g2boojum
-- 
Grant Goodyear	
Gentoo Developer
g2boojum@g.o
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0  9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
Attachment:
pgpYfwywkzCIc.pgp (PGP signature)
Replies:
Re: [gentoo-core] Suspended devs and -core
-- Sven Vermeulen
Re: Suspended devs and -core
-- Deedra Waters
Re: Suspended devs and -core
-- Corey Shields
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-devrel: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
meeting time, round something...
Next by thread:
Re: Suspended devs and -core
Previous by date:
Re: meeting time, round something...
Next by date:
Re: Suspended devs and -core


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-devrel mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.