| 1 |
Erm, the commitee would consist of those devrel people who origionally |
| 2 |
volonteered to be part of the judge/investigation parts. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
I'm not sure where you got the "any dev" idea. |
| 5 |
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Elfyn McBratney wrote: |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 16:25:21 +0000 |
| 8 |
> From: Elfyn McBratney <beu@g.o> |
| 9 |
> Reply-To: gentoo-devrel@l.g.o |
| 10 |
> To: gentoo-devrel@l.g.o |
| 11 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-devrel] devrel meeting etc |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> On Tuesday 06 Sep 2005 17:02, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 14 |
>> On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 11:19:48 -0500 (CDT) Deedra Waters |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> <dmwaters@g.o> wrote: |
| 17 |
>> | Basically, for the most part, the transparency of how complaints are |
| 18 |
>> | handled stays the same. The only thing i really want to change, is |
| 19 |
>> | that i think that a commitee of say 3 to 5 people handles a complaint |
| 20 |
>> | from beginning to end. Basically, i think that this is much simpler, |
| 21 |
>> | and the devrel members i've mentioned it to seem to like this idea. |
| 22 |
>> | The big thing for most people is that what ever happens, the |
| 23 |
>> | transparency needs to stay, and i completely agree there. |
| 24 |
>> |
| 25 |
>> Mmmm, judge, jury and executioner. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Eh ? I really don't see your point here. From past meetings I've attended, |
| 28 |
> this 'committee' will be made up of not just devrel members, but other |
| 29 |
> run-of-the-mill developers, too. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> So. Care to justify your statement ? |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> Elfyn |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
Deedra Waters - Gentoo developer relations, accessibility and infrastructure - |
| 39 |
dmwaters@g.o |
| 40 |
Gentoo linux: http://www.gentoo.org |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
-- |
| 43 |
gentoo-devrel@g.o mailing list |
Archives