On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 15:04 -0400, Jon Portnoy wrote:
> Sent to devrel@ before realizing it was rather more appropriate here, my 
> bad. Forwarding.
> 
> 
> 
> Today's devrel meeting confirmed the pending conflict resolution RFC
> (http://dev.gentoo.org/~avenj/Devrel_ConflictResRoadmap), thus it's time 
> to determine member selection. Attached are my thoughts on the subject 
> for discussion.
> 
> 
> 

To stimulate conversation, I'll just add that I believe this accurately
reflects what we determined in the meeting to be the best way to
proceed, unless objections, problems we didn't think of, etc.

> RFC
> Selecting/removing conflict resolution subproject members
> 
> - Initial member selection
> 	The initial conflict resolution lead should be chosen via a short 
> nomination period & voting. The lead should then compose a list of four 
> primary board members. Once the list is presented to devrel for review, 
> objections may be raised and the final list will be voted on.
> 
> - Conflict of interest rotation
> 
> 	For each complaint filed, devrel leads & conflict resolution lead 
> are expected to speak with board members to examine any conflict of 
> interest issues. Members determined to have a conflict of interest 
> should be rotated out and replacements chosen for the interim. At the 
> conflict resolution lead's discretion, members rotated out may be 
> brought back on or remain in reserve after the pending action is 
> complete.
> 
> - Complaints & removal
>  	Complaints raised about conflict resolution members may be raised 
> to leads or at devrel meetings for discussion at any time. Devrel-wide 
> votes may be taken to remove members from the project under extreme 
> circumstances. Members may also be removed at the subproject lead's 
> discretion with an explanation to devrel.
> 
> -- 
> Jon Portnoy
> avenj/irc.freenode.net

Regards,
Ferris
-- 
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc)