1 |
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 10:30:20PM -0400, Olivier Fisette wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> You now suggest going back (in some ways) to how things were done |
4 |
> before, even though devrel was blamed for the way the last |
5 |
> incident was handled, and even though the separation of devrel |
6 |
> in two groups was suggested to help avoiding abuse and lack of |
7 |
> transparency. |
8 |
|
9 |
There's never been any abuse and transparency is irrelevant to |
10 |
separating the two. Unfortunately when certain individual(s) can't get |
11 |
away with flat out insulting other individuals it somehow turns into |
12 |
"devrel is abusive." Sorry, I don't buy it. |
13 |
|
14 |
When pressed for a depthful example of an incident of devrel being |
15 |
"abusive" nobody's come up with anything yet and frankly it sucks that |
16 |
devrel took the Ciaran vs. devrel popularity contest to heart enough |
17 |
to totally ruin devrel as an effective problem resolution body. |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
Jon Portnoy |
21 |
avenj/irc.freenode.net |
22 |
-- |
23 |
gentoo-devrel@g.o mailing list |