On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 11:21:33AM -0500, Paul Varner wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 08:52 -0500, Deedra Waters wrote:
> > I said from the beginning that I had not written up a proposal for it.
> > Why? Because i wanted some form of discussion first so that i could get
> > a feel for people's concerns and thoughts on it besides those who i've
> > already talked to. Proposals are great and all, but it helps when you
> > actually see what people expect first...
> 
> Since we are talking about a displinary process, my expectation is to
> see a documented, open process that is as fair and balanced as we as an
> organization can be.
> 
> I expect that the facts will be documented.  I expect that the persons
> making the decision will be as impartial as fully possible. I expect
> that any decisons that contain adverse consequences to be well thought
> out and documented.
> 

Nobody said anything about openness or documenting things or anything, 
that really has nothing to do with having separate groups at all.

The point is that separate groups are a pointless complication that 
won't help anything. That does not affect documenting things in the 
least.

-- 
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net
-- 
gentoo-devrel@g.o mailing list