I don't know which would be easier for infra, but giving them access to
archives i would think would be best. The reason they lose access to
core is because their gentoo address is removed from lists.

Grant has a point though. If we can go with access to archives, I'd
prefer that route.
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Grant Goodyear wrote:

> Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 15:27:28 -0500
> From: Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o>
> Reply-To: gentoo-devrel@g.o
> To: gentoo-devrel@g.o, gentoo-core@g.o
> Subject: [gentoo-devrel] Suspended devs and -core
>
> My understanding is that a dev who is suspended loses all access to
> -core.  Is that right?  Assuming so, it occurs to me that if we expect
> the dev to come back (and I assume we do, or the dev would be expelled
> instead of suspended), then perhaps it would make more sense to only remove
> write access to -core, while leaving read access?  An alternative would
> be if we archived -core, and the newly reinstated dev could then read
> the archives, but read-only access seems simpler.  The rationale is that
> in those rare cases where suspended devs return, it benefits Gentoo if
> the suspended dev is able to stay up to date.
>
> Thougnts or comments?
>
> Thanks,
> g2boojum
>

-- 
Deedra Waters - Gentoo developer relations, accessibility and infrastructure -
dmwaters@g.o
Gentoo linux: http://www.gentoo.org

-- 
gentoo-devrel@g.o mailing list