1 |
On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 14:16 -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote: |
2 |
> Aron Griffis wrote: [Mon Sep 12 2005, 01:37:33PM CDT] |
3 |
> > You make a good point concerning the checks and balances inherently |
4 |
> > available in a voting system. Nonetheless, you'll displease a lot of |
5 |
> > people by doing away with one of the core attributes of the proposal, |
6 |
> > so IMHO it would help to explain how it has hindered you so far. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> One thing that I've noticed about devrel in the past is that a lot of |
9 |
> the interactions between devrel members (especially recruiters) happen |
10 |
> on irc, not on mailing lists or bugs. The result is a situation like |
11 |
> the current one (I suspect), where somebody in devrel proposes something |
12 |
> big with little explanation, because many of the people involved already |
13 |
> know what all of the issues are. The problem, of course, is that then a |
14 |
> lot of people are both taken completely by surprise (because they aren't |
15 |
> an integral part of that specialized community) and have no good way to |
16 |
> find out what's been happening. If this relatively new enforcement |
17 |
> system isn't working, then of course it should be fixed, but the |
18 |
> non-cognoscenti are going to need much more information before any fix |
19 |
> can appear to be a rational solution. |
20 |
> |
21 |
|
22 |
The new system hasn't been needed yet. |
23 |
|
24 |
> Personally, I'm still fond of my long-ago suggestion that the judgement |
25 |
> part of the process should be handled by a randomly-selected group of |
26 |
> devs, but I'm perfectly willing to accept that such a proposal is |
27 |
> unrealistic. |
28 |
> |
29 |
Interesting. Would you think of this as randomly selected from a group |
30 |
of self-designated devs who are willing to serve, or would you make |
31 |
"willingness" implicit in being a dev, so it's sort of like jury duty, |
32 |
or what? |
33 |
|
34 |
I think I personally would want to require that one devrel member sit on |
35 |
the judgment board, but otherwise, why not? |
36 |
> -g2boojum- |
37 |
Regards, |
38 |
-- |
39 |
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o> |
40 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Devrel) |