On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 16:25 +0000, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 Sep 2005 17:02, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 11:19:48 -0500 (CDT) Deedra Waters
> > <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > | Basically, for the most part, the transparency of how complaints are
> > | handled stays the same. The only thing i really want to change, is
> > | that i think that a commitee of say 3 to 5 people handles a complaint
> > | from beginning to end. Basically, i think that this is much simpler,
> > | and the devrel members i've mentioned it to seem to like this idea.
> > | The big thing for most people is that what ever happens, the
> > | transparency needs to stay, and i completely agree there.
> > Mmmm, judge, jury and executioner.
> Eh ? I really don't see your point here. From past meetings I've attended,
> this 'committee' will be made up of not just devrel members, but other
> run-of-the-mill developers, too.
As written currently, it's "Developer Relations members." Or I missing
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <email@example.com>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Devrel)