On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 16:25 +0000, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 Sep 2005 17:02, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 11:19:48 -0500 (CDT) Deedra Waters
> >
> > <dmwaters@g.o> wrote:
> > |   Basically, for the most part, the transparency of how complaints are
> > |   handled stays the same. The only thing i really want to change, is
> > | that i think that a commitee of say 3 to 5 people handles a complaint
> > | from beginning to end. Basically, i think that this is much simpler,
> > | and the devrel members i've mentioned it to seem to like this idea.
> > | The big thing for most people is that what ever happens, the
> > | transparency needs to stay, and i completely  agree there.
> >
> > Mmmm, judge, jury and executioner.
> 
> Eh ?  I really don't see your point here.  From past meetings I've attended, 
> this 'committee' will be made up of not just devrel members, but other 
> run-of-the-mill developers, too.
> 

As written currently, it's "Developer Relations members."  Or I missing
your point?

Regards,
Ferris
-- 
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Devrel)