1 |
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 16:25 +0000, Elfyn McBratney wrote: |
2 |
> On Tuesday 06 Sep 2005 17:02, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
3 |
> > On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 11:19:48 -0500 (CDT) Deedra Waters |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > <dmwaters@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
> > | Basically, for the most part, the transparency of how complaints are |
7 |
> > | handled stays the same. The only thing i really want to change, is |
8 |
> > | that i think that a commitee of say 3 to 5 people handles a complaint |
9 |
> > | from beginning to end. Basically, i think that this is much simpler, |
10 |
> > | and the devrel members i've mentioned it to seem to like this idea. |
11 |
> > | The big thing for most people is that what ever happens, the |
12 |
> > | transparency needs to stay, and i completely agree there. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > Mmmm, judge, jury and executioner. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Eh ? I really don't see your point here. From past meetings I've attended, |
17 |
> this 'committee' will be made up of not just devrel members, but other |
18 |
> run-of-the-mill developers, too. |
19 |
> |
20 |
|
21 |
As written currently, it's "Developer Relations members." Or I missing |
22 |
your point? |
23 |
|
24 |
Regards, |
25 |
Ferris |
26 |
-- |
27 |
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o> |
28 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Devrel) |