Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-devrel
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-devrel: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-devrel@g.o, gentoo-core@g.o
From: Corey Shields <cshields@g.o>
Subject: Re: Suspended devs and -core
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:59:14 -0700
On Monday 06 June 2005 01:27 pm, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> My understanding is that a dev who is suspended loses all access to
> -core.  Is that right?  Assuming so, it occurs to me that if we expect
> the dev to come back (and I assume we do, or the dev would be expelled
> instead of suspended), then perhaps it would make more sense to only remove
> write access to -core, while leaving read access?  An alternative would
> be if we archived -core, and the newly reinstated dev could then read
> the archives, but read-only access seems simpler.  The rationale is that
> in those rare cases where suspended devs return, it benefits Gentoo if
> the suspended dev is able to stay up to date.

I have no problem with it..  I assume that people will forward threads to a 
suspended dev anyway, so may as well have it.

-C

-- 
Corey Shields
Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Team and Devrel Team
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees
http://www.gentoo.org/~cshields
Attachment:
pgpXBvVTXFLAW.pgp (PGP signature)
References:
Suspended devs and -core
-- Grant Goodyear
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-devrel: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Suspended devs and -core
Next by thread:
Re: Suspended devs and -core
Previous by date:
Suspended devs and -core
Next by date:
Re: Suspended devs and -core


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-devrel mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.