List Archive: gentoo-devrel
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
On Monday 06 June 2005 01:27 pm, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> My understanding is that a dev who is suspended loses all access to
> -core. Is that right? Assuming so, it occurs to me that if we expect
> the dev to come back (and I assume we do, or the dev would be expelled
> instead of suspended), then perhaps it would make more sense to only remove
> write access to -core, while leaving read access? An alternative would
> be if we archived -core, and the newly reinstated dev could then read
> the archives, but read-only access seems simpler. The rationale is that
> in those rare cases where suspended devs return, it benefits Gentoo if
> the suspended dev is able to stay up to date.
I have no problem with it.. I assume that people will forward threads to a
suspended dev anyway, so may as well have it.
Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Team and Devrel Team
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees