Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-devrel
On Tuesday 06 Sep 2005 17:02, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 11:19:48 -0500 (CDT) Deedra Waters
>
> <dmwaters@g.o> wrote:
> | Basically, for the most part, the transparency of how complaints are
> | handled stays the same. The only thing i really want to change, is
> | that i think that a commitee of say 3 to 5 people handles a complaint
> | from beginning to end. Basically, i think that this is much simpler,
> | and the devrel members i've mentioned it to seem to like this idea.
> | The big thing for most people is that what ever happens, the
> | transparency needs to stay, and i completely agree there.
>
> Mmmm, judge, jury and executioner.
Eh ? I really don't see your point here. From past meetings I've attended,
this 'committee' will be made up of not just devrel members, but other
run-of-the-mill developers, too.
So. Care to justify your statement ?
Elfyn
--
Elfyn McBratney
beu/irc.freenode.net http://dev.gentoo.org/~beu/
+------------O.o--------------------- http://dev.gentoo.org/~beu/pubkey.asc
PGP Key ID: 0x69DF17AD
PGP Key Fingerprint:
DBD3 B756 ED58 B1B4 47B9 B3BD 8D41 E597 69DF 17AD
|
|