1 |
On Tuesday 06 Sep 2005 17:02, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 11:19:48 -0500 (CDT) Deedra Waters |
3 |
> |
4 |
> <dmwaters@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
> | Basically, for the most part, the transparency of how complaints are |
6 |
> | handled stays the same. The only thing i really want to change, is |
7 |
> | that i think that a commitee of say 3 to 5 people handles a complaint |
8 |
> | from beginning to end. Basically, i think that this is much simpler, |
9 |
> | and the devrel members i've mentioned it to seem to like this idea. |
10 |
> | The big thing for most people is that what ever happens, the |
11 |
> | transparency needs to stay, and i completely agree there. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Mmmm, judge, jury and executioner. |
14 |
|
15 |
Eh ? I really don't see your point here. From past meetings I've attended, |
16 |
this 'committee' will be made up of not just devrel members, but other |
17 |
run-of-the-mill developers, too. |
18 |
|
19 |
So. Care to justify your statement ? |
20 |
|
21 |
Elfyn |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Elfyn McBratney |
25 |
beu/irc.freenode.net http://dev.gentoo.org/~beu/ |
26 |
+------------O.o--------------------- http://dev.gentoo.org/~beu/pubkey.asc |
27 |
|
28 |
PGP Key ID: 0x69DF17AD |
29 |
PGP Key Fingerprint: |
30 |
DBD3 B756 ED58 B1B4 47B9 B3BD 8D41 E597 69DF 17AD |