Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-devrel
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-devrel: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: proctors@g.o
From: Wernfried Haas <amne@g.o>
Subject: Re: Equal treatment of developers in violation of policy
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:32:30 +0200
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 02:35:47PM +0000, Ferris McCormick wrote:
> [snip]
> So I think the answer to hparker's question is that we try very hard
> to treat all violators the same way; fundamental fairness demands it.
> If you step back a bit from the ciaranm hearing, you will see that the
> entire stage 2, 3 process was active in that case.

I think it's the same here, if any difference should be made, higher
standards should be kept for developers as they represent Gentoo as a
whole. How much of a difference dev status should make - no idea, i
don't recall having this discussed with the proctors folks (yet), so
this rather only my personal opinion.

cheers,
	Wernfried

-- 
Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne at gentoo dot org
Gentoo Forums: http://forums.gentoo.org
IRC: #gentoo-forums on freenode - email: forum-mods at gentoo dot org
Attachment:
pgphUmt7QeIZM.pgp (PGP signature)
References:
Equal treatment of developers in violation of policy
-- Ferris McCormick
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-devrel: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Equal treatment of developers in violation of policy
Next by thread:
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Resignation
Previous by date:
Equal treatment of developers in violation of policy
Next by date:
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Resignation


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-devrel mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.