List Archive: gentoo-devrel
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 11:19 -0500, Deedra Waters wrote:
> Basically, for the most part, the transparency of how complaints are
> handled stays the same. The only thing i really want to change, is that
> i think that a commitee of say 3 to 5 people handles a complaint from
> beginning to end. Basically, i think that this is much simpler, and the
> devrel members i've mentioned it to seem to like this idea. The big
> thing for most people is that what ever happens, the transparency needs
> to stay, and i completely agree there.
> So, 1. I'd like to see some discussion over the next couple of days to
> get feedback, and 2. I'd like to shoot for 1800 UTC on friday for a
My gut reaction to reading this proposal was no! While I can see a need
for reducing the number of people involved with a complaint, I firmly
feel that in order to ensure fairness in the complaint process that
there needs to be checks and balances in place. The recent changes to
split the investigative from the judical side of developer relations and
make everything transparent as possible does much to accomplish this.
I strongly feel that moving back to a small committee would be a step
backwards in that respect.
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list