Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-devrel
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 12:58:50PM -0500, Paul Varner wrote:
>
> My gut reaction to reading this proposal was no! While I can see a need
> for reducing the number of people involved with a complaint, I firmly
> feel that in order to ensure fairness in the complaint process that
> there needs to be checks and balances in place. The recent changes to
> split the investigative from the judical side of developer relations and
> make everything transparent as possible does much to accomplish this.
>
No, mostly it does a lot to accomplish castrating devrel and making it
ineffective.
We have a working council now, that means if somebody feels devrel is
acting unfairly or not being open enough there's a body to appeal to.
--
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net
--
gentoo-devrel@g.o mailing list
|
|