On Thursday 15 September 2005 05:06 pm, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 15:28 -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> > One of the consequences of the management restructuring is that at some
> > point stuff in gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en will probably move around. Of
> > course, doing that in CVS is a royal pain. I'd love to see our gentoo
> > tree migrate over to svn (not the portage tree, just gentoo!), but of
> > course you folks are the major users of that tree. Has this been
> > considered? This tree is still fairly large, so it might not yet be
> > feasible w/ svn, but I don't know if anybody has tried.
> The tree is ~250MB at this time. Both genkernel and catalyst are under
> this tree, and I'm sure that we don't want to move either of these any
> time soon.
i think this thread was more about gentoo/xml/ ... but gentoo/src/ is
certainly candidate for moving to svn as soon as project leads feel it's
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list