| 1 |
Peter Volkov wrote, on 09/16/2010 06:46 PM: |
| 2 |
> Hi, guys. While there is some job required to move portage tree into git |
| 3 |
> it looks like moving documentation and web-site could be done much |
| 4 |
> easier. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Yeah, git++. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> Are there any plans to move on git? Was anything done in this |
| 9 |
> direction? This will simplify translator's job as we are planning to use |
| 10 |
> git that makes commits faster and allows us to ease workflow. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Who is "we" in this case? The translators? If yes, has there been some |
| 13 |
discussion? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Also, how exactly does it ease workflow? Is there something specific for |
| 16 |
translating stuff that CVS can't do? |
Archives