Gentoo Archives: gentoo-doc

From: Joshua Saddler <nightmorph@g.o>
To: gentoo-doc@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-doc] Re: okupy, a Django rewrite of www.g.o
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 09:37:30
Message-Id: 20110607023557.05d5b440@angelstorm
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-doc] Re: okupy, a Django rewrite of www.g.o by "Jan Kundrát"
1 On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:47:09 +0200
2 Jan Kundrát <jkt@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > On 06/02/11 12:29, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
5 > > Sure, I contacted Josh who showed much interest to my idea, and
6 > > Infra to make sure they (we) are willing to replace gorg
7 >
8 > Hi Theo, thanks for clarification and for your reply. Too bad Josh
9 > did not pass the word along the GDP. Given how much stuff he does,
10 > I'm sure he was just swamped with work.
11
12 Indeed. Actually, I thought I mentioned it a time or two, on one of
13 my infrequent visits to #gentoo-doc or the mailing lists, but it may
14 have slipped my mind entirely.
15
16 Basically, if it would ease contribution without disrupting the
17 experienced contributors' current GuideXML workflow, I'm all for it.
18 Maintaining all this stuff by myself sucks.
19
20 Okupy is an independent project, as many efforts to revamp and expand
21 our website/docs have been, so I don't see that it'll do any harm.
22 Okupy development doesn't seem like it would interfere with
23 maintaining our existing documentation. I would like a few other devs
24 be willing to answer questions from the Okupy crowd; I'm not on IRC
25 enough to provide realtime feedback.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature