| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Peter Humphrey wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> I'd like to know what support there would be for splitting the two |
| 7 |
> languages, so that original documents would be written using either the |
| 8 |
> en_GB or the en_US locale and then be translated to the other. I'd be |
| 9 |
> happy to contribute to such a translation effort. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
This is a serious waste of time IMHO. en_GB and en_US. Makes zero sense |
| 12 |
to have two versions of the same doc. What about the other zillion en_* |
| 13 |
locales? :) |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
My point is, if a doc is readable, understandable and correct |
| 16 |
grammatically and/or otherwise...it is fine. If it ain't broke, don't |
| 17 |
fix it. We're not the GEDP :) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
- -- |
| 20 |
Shyam Mani | <fox2mike@g.o> |
| 21 |
docs-team | http://gdp.gentoo.org |
| 22 |
GPG key | 0xFDD0E345 |
| 23 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 24 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
iD8DBQFCzlIdYZNYgP3Q40URAhVBAKCorjllYiTyOXYewxxJtl3vkz4npQCfezOx |
| 27 |
wtbrAN2sBuXTR6SpzzLkWCU= |
| 28 |
=BoPo |
| 29 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-doc@g.o mailing list |
Archives