Gentoo Archives: gentoo-doc

From: Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o>
To: gentoo-doc@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-doc] svn vs cvs
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 20:30:05
Message-Id: 20050915202858.GE3966@bmb24.uth.tmc.edu
1 Hi, all.
2
3 One of the consequences of the management restructuring is that at some
4 point stuff in gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en will probably move around. Of
5 course, doing that in CVS is a royal pain. I'd love to see our gentoo
6 tree migrate over to svn (not the portage tree, just gentoo!), but of
7 course you folks are the major users of that tree. Has this been
8 considered? This tree is still fairly large, so it might not yet be
9 feasible w/ svn, but I don't know if anybody has tried.
10
11 Thanks,
12 g2boojum
13 --
14 Grant Goodyear
15 Gentoo Developer
16 g2boojum@g.o
17 http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
18 GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-doc] svn vs cvs Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-doc] svn vs cvs Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-doc] svn vs cvs Sven Vermeulen <swift@g.o>